<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Immanent Frame &#187; Stathis Gourgouris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/author/stathis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif</link>
	<description>Secularism, religion, and the public sphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:26:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Anti-secularist failures</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/04/19/anti-secularist-failures/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/04/19/anti-secularist-failures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stathis Gourgouris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Is critique secular?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess it's to be expected that in today's fashionable anti-secularist perspective an act of secular criticism that calls for "de-transcendentalizing the secular" would be unfathomable---not merely contrarian or inadvisable, but inconceivable, unaccountable. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/04/19/anti-secularist-failures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good ol’ time American politics?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/02/04/good-ol%e2%80%99-time-american-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/02/04/good-ol%e2%80%99-time-american-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stathis Gourgouris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion & American politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/02/04/good-ol%e2%80%99-time-american-politics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citizens responding to the current electoral climate of Christian agonistics – if they care at all about the significance and responsibility of <em>citizenship </em>– need to guard against certain crucial and pragmatic dangers. At the very least, they need to be concerned with any aspiring leader who happens to think heaven is a better place than earth, particularly at a time in human history when the planet is taking such a ruthless beating. For, if any future government chooses to take up the business of salvation, then, permit me to say, we’ve all gone to hell.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/02/04/good-ol%e2%80%99-time-american-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>De-transcendentalizing the secular</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/01/31/de-transcendentalizing-the-secular/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/01/31/de-transcendentalizing-the-secular/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stathis Gourgouris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Is critique secular?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rethinking secularism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/01/31/de-transcendentalizing-the-secular/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How one answers the question “<a title="Is critique secular?" href="http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/category/is-critique-secular/">Is critique secular?</a>” determines substantially how one engages with secularism, how one comes to defend it, repudiate it, or reconceptualize it. My answer to this question is unequivocal: Yes, critique is secular, and to go even further, if the secular imagination ceases to seek and to enact critique, it ceases to be secular. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/01/31/de-transcendentalizing-the-secular/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A case of heteronomous thinking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/01/19/a-case-of-heteronomous-thinking/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/01/19/a-case-of-heteronomous-thinking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stathis Gourgouris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Secular Age]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/01/19/a-case-of-heteronomous-thinking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://harvardpress.typepad.com/hup_publicity/2007/11/a-secular-age-h.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/secular_age.jpg" border="0" alt="" align="right" /></a>As a story, <em>A Secular Age</em> rivals Hans Blumenberg’s <a title="The Legitimacy of the Modern Age" href="http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&#38;tid=7218" target="_blank"><em>The Legitimacy of the Modern Age</em> </a>(which curiously it ignores) and does indeed belong to the largely neglected genre of speculative history. No doubt, it is a work of a lifetime’s worth of erudition – about this there can be no argument – but the easiest thing one can do is to praise it. The best and most profound of what it has to offer is precisely that the domains of thought and history it privileges be interrogated in order to stand as departure points for further thinking. This interrogation and evaluation cannot stay simply at the level of the story, but must extend to what authorizes the story, Charles Taylor’s (conscious or unconscious, explicit or implicit) politics. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/01/19/a-case-of-heteronomous-thinking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
