Ian Hunter

Ian Hunter is an emeritus professor in the Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities at the University of Queensland and is currently Velux Visiting Professor attached to the ‘Office as a Vocation’ project of the Public Private Platform at the Copenhagen Business School. His present post is based on a lecture presented at the CBS and at the Max-Weber-Kolleg, University of Erfurt. He is the author of several studies on early modern political and religious thought, including Rival Enlightenments (2001) and The Secularisation of the Confessional State (2007).

Posts by Ian Hunter:

Monday, June 13th, 2016

Secularization histories as cultural-political programs

In a The Immanent Frame post on buffered selves, Charles Taylor commented that “The process of disenchantment, involving a change in us, can be seen as a loss of a certain sensibility that is really an impoverishment (as against simply the shedding of irrational feelings).” For Taylor, selves that have been sealed against currents of transcendence flowing through cosmos and community are symptoms of an epochal process of secularization that has rationalized or disenchanted both individuals and whole societies. While not being the only one on offer—Jürgen Habermas and Daniel Dennett provide rival Kantian and naturalist accounts—Taylor’s account of a “disembedding” of the transcendent brought about by a self-alienating religion is probably the dominant philosophical history of a “secular age.” Given that Taylor aligns secularization with “Reform Christianity” and dates it to the 1500s, however, what should we make of the fact that the term was not used to refer to an epochal process of rationalization until the early nineteenth century?

Read the rest of Secularization histories as cultural-political programs.
Tuesday, September 10th, 2013

The return of sacred history

Brad Gregory’s The Unintended Reformation is an expansively ambitious work. Indeed, its aim is to provide nothing less than an “explanation of why the Western world today is as it is.” In this regard it sits comfortably alongside Charles Taylor’s A Secular Age, with whose neo-Thomist structure, content, and purpose it has much in common. Both writers mix their Thomism with Hegelianism, treating the secular world as the form in which man confronts his own alienated or sublimated religious impulse. Lying behind this philosophical-historical theory of secularization is a conception of the world as the space in which its transcendent creator manifests himself sacramentally

Read the rest of The return of sacred history.