<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Immanent Frame &#187; Kevin den Dulk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/author/dendulk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif</link>
	<description>Secularism, religion, and the public sphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:00:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Justice and rights-talk in liberal democracies</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2009/02/24/justice-and-rights-talk-in-liberal-democracies/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2009/02/24/justice-and-rights-talk-in-liberal-democracies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin den Dulk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/?p=1268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2009/02/24/justice-and-rights-talk-in-liberal-democracies/" target="_self"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1258" style="border: 0pt none; float: right;" title="Justice: Rights and Wrongs (Princeton University Press 2007)" src="http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/justice-197x300.gif" alt="&#60;p&#62;&#60;/p&#62;" width="80" /></a>Nicholas Wolterstorff's <em><a title="Princeton University Press, 2007" href="http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8680.html" target="_blank">Justice: Rights and Wrongs</a></em> is a profoundly ambitious book.  His normative aspiration is nothing less than "speaking up for the wronged of the world" by reorienting contemporary thinking on rights and justice. ... But what about the <em>practice</em> of liberal democracy?  What would it mean to govern so that members of a society can "enjoy the goods to which they have a right"?  <em>Justice </em>is not a book of practical application, but it is clearly on Wolterstorff's mind.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2009/02/24/justice-and-rights-talk-in-liberal-democracies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
