<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Immanent Frame &#187; Mark S. Cladis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/author/cladis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif</link>
	<description>Secularism, religion, and the public sphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:22:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nothing special about religion</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/06/25/nothing-special-about-religion/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/06/25/nothing-special-about-religion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark S. Cladis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion in the public sphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/?p=273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is clear from the ongoing discussion about <a title="Religion in the public sphere" href="http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/category/religion-in-the-public-sphere/" target="_self">"Religion in the public sphere"</a> that we live in an age when many inside and outside of the academy are thinking and talking about religion---<em>specifically about religion in public and whether it ought to be there</em>.  Many are turning their attention to the relation among religion, law, and politics, now that the once-common theories about the inevitable march of (what is commonly understood as) secularization have been mostly discredited.  Such theories were based on an erroneous interpretation of the Enlightenment as a monolithic force that discounted religion, and on the view that modernity would necessarily usher in secularism, that is, launch an age in which religion had no significant standing.  Yet most have come to realize that religion as an intellectual, cultural, and political force is not, in fact, waning on the globe. To help us think about religion in the public and political landscape, I propose a model---what I call <em>Public Landscape as Varied Topography</em>---in which there is room for various socio-political stances, religious or otherwise. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/06/25/nothing-special-about-religion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
