<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Immanent Frame &#187; Michael Barnett</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/author/barnett/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif</link>
	<description>Secularism, religion, and the public sphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:54:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The wages of engagement</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2010/03/04/the-wages-of-engagement/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2010/03/04/the-wages-of-engagement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religious freedoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/?p=9308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2010/03/04/the-wages-of-engagement/"><img class="alignright" title="Engaging Religious Communities Abroad: A New Imperative for U.S. Foreign Policy - Chicago Council on Global Affairs" src="http://www.thechicagocouncil.org/UserFiles/Image/Promo/ReligionTF.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="157" /></a>“<a title="PDF" href="http://www.thechicagocouncil.org/UserFiles/File/Task%20Force%20Reports/2010%20Religion%20Task%20Force_Full%20Report.pdf" target="_blank">Engaging Religious Communities Abroad: A New Imperative for U.S. Foreign Policy</a>” is an ambitious, thoughtful, and thought-provoking report that makes for necessary reading. Public discussions of religion are always difficult, and any attempt to forge a path for the United States to engage religion in world affairs is destined to leave controversy in its wake. Accordingly, the authors deserve considerable credit for confronting a cluster of hot-button issues---and, moreover, for doing so through a comprehensive and wide-ranging dialogue that included a broad spectrum of opinions.  This report should be debated and discussed, not necessarily because it answers the difficult questions to everyone’s satisfaction, but rather because it confronts the difficult questions and tries, with honesty and integrity, to propose possible solutions. I was a member of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs' <a title="Chicago Council on Global Affairs" href="http://www.thechicagocouncil.org/taskforce_details.php?taskforce_id=10" target="_blank">Task Force on Religion and the Making of U.S. Foreign Policy</a> that informed the report, and, while I proudly associate myself with it, there are two issues that worry me.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2010/03/04/the-wages-of-engagement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remaking the world</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/03/17/remaking-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/03/17/remaking-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Secularism & international relations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/03/17/remaking-the-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are international relations theorists about to awake from their long secular slumber and discover that the world has had, has, and always will have a religious dimension? There is clearly a growing interest in religion, much of it driven by its presumed association with various forms of collective violence. Yet so far international relations theorists have spent little time wondering how religion in global life might implicate their existing theories of international relations or how existing theories of international relations might help us better understand the shape, forms, and consequences of religion in world affairs. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/03/17/remaking-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
