In his December 2008 Foerster Lecture at UC-Berkeley,Talal Asad discusses “attempts by anthropologists and others to define religion, the shifting place of “belief” in that endeavor, and some of its implications for politics.” Watch the related interview here.
VanAntwerpen J. Talal Asad on religion, belief and politics. The Immanent Frame. 2009. Available at: http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2009/01/13/talal-asad-on-religion-belief-and-politics/. Accessed May 16, 2012.
APA citation:
VanAntwerpen, Jonathan. (2009). Talal Asad on religion, belief and politics. Retrieved May 16, 2012, from The Immanent Frame Web site: http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2009/01/13/talal-asad-on-religion-belief-and-politics/
Chicago citation:
VanAntwerpen, Jonathan. 2009. Talal Asad on religion, belief and politics. The Immanent Frame. http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2009/01/13/talal-asad-on-religion-belief-and-politics/ (accessed May 16, 2012).
Harvard citation:
VanAntwerpen, J 2009, Talal Asad on religion, belief and politics, The Immanent Frame. Retrieved May 16, 2012, from <http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2009/01/13/talal-asad-on-religion-belief-and-politics/>
MLA citation:
VanAntwerpen, Jonathan. "Talal Asad on religion, belief and politics." 13 Jan. 2009. The Immanent Frame. Accessed 16 May. 2012. <http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2009/01/13/talal-asad-on-religion-belief-and-politics/>
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, January 13th, 2009 at 7:00 am and is filed under here & there.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
One Response to “Talal Asad on religion, belief and politics”
This intriguing anthropologist reads a paper which frames his argument on religion, discipline, and political authority. Truly brilliant; he uses Hirschkind’s example of Islamic readings in Cairo to make his points about religious sensibility and its effects on political domains in the modern world.
Leave a Reply
Please note: All comments will be approved by an administrator before they appear on this page.
This intriguing anthropologist reads a paper which frames his argument on religion, discipline, and political authority. Truly brilliant; he uses Hirschkind’s example of Islamic readings in Cairo to make his points about religious sensibility and its effects on political domains in the modern world.