Readers at Clavi Non Defixi are debating the merits of our recent announcement about academic citations at The Immanent Frame. One commenter pointed to an interesting article in The Economist, which reports the launch of Research Blogging, “a website which acts as a hub for scientists to discuss peer-reviewed science.”

IN PRE-INTERNET times, peer-reviewed journals were the best way to disseminate research to a broad audience. Even today, editors and reviewers cherry-pick papers deemed the most revelatory and dispatch them to interested subscribers worldwide. The process is cumbersome and expensive, but it has allowed experts to keep track of the most prominent developments in their respective fields.

[...]

Although Web 2.0, with its emphasis on user-generated content, has been derided as a commercial cul-de-sac, it may prove to be a path to speedier scientific advancement. According to Adam Bly, Seed’s founder, internet-aided interdisciplinarity and globalisation, coupled with a generational shift, portend a great revolution. His optimism stems in large part from the fact that the new technologies are no mere newfangled gimmicks, but spring from a desire for timely peer review.

Read the full article here.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 at 11:06 am and is filed under here & there. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.