<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Academic citations at The Immanent Frame</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/09/18/academic-citations-at-the-immanent-frame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/09/18/academic-citations-at-the-immanent-frame/</link>
	<description>Secularism, religion, and the public sphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: John Postill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/09/18/academic-citations-at-the-immanent-frame/comment-page-1/#comment-4584</link>
		<dc:creator>John Postill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 22:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/?p=374#comment-4584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it would be great to have more blog posts that take the form of scholarly notes or mini-essays (say 500-1000 words) and are fully referenced. It&#039;d also be good to see more posts that summarise a scholarly piece or two recently read by the blogger-scholar, again with full refs. Finally, I&#039;ve been thinking aloud lately about a genre that I haven&#039;t yet come across: peer-reviewed blog posts. I don&#039;t have in mind here lengthy peer reviews that take months, but rather reasonably fast turnovers (2-3 weeks) for brief pieces.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be great to have more blog posts that take the form of scholarly notes or mini-essays (say 500-1000 words) and are fully referenced. It&#8217;d also be good to see more posts that summarise a scholarly piece or two recently read by the blogger-scholar, again with full refs. Finally, I&#8217;ve been thinking aloud lately about a genre that I haven&#8217;t yet come across: peer-reviewed blog posts. I don&#8217;t have in mind here lengthy peer reviews that take months, but rather reasonably fast turnovers (2-3 weeks) for brief pieces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth Braunstein</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/09/18/academic-citations-at-the-immanent-frame/comment-page-1/#comment-4578</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Braunstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/?p=374#comment-4578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those who are interested in using the academic citations plug-in on their own blogs, please visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.academicsandbox.com/academic_citations.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;academic sandbox&lt;/a&gt; for more information from Julie Meloni, the developer of this plug-in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who are interested in using the academic citations plug-in on their own blogs, please visit <a href="http://www.academicsandbox.com/academic_citations.html" rel="nofollow">academic sandbox</a> for more information from Julie Meloni, the developer of this plug-in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hickerson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/09/18/academic-citations-at-the-immanent-frame/comment-page-1/#comment-4577</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hickerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/?p=374#comment-4577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a great idea!  Is this a plug-in that other blogs could use?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great idea!  Is this a plug-in that other blogs could use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
