Genocide Debate
Monday, August 17th, 2009
posted by
Pieter Tesch
While previously in the genocide debate it has been stressed that the ultimate Nazi crime is that of the Shoah of European Jewry and therefore the term of genocide should remain clearly defined and not loosely used, and certainly not abused for political motives, in relation to events in the present as well as in [...]
Read the rest of The Legacy and Consequences of the Crimes of (Afro) Stalinism.
Posted in Genocide Debate, Making Sense of Darfur | 2 Comments » |
Saturday, June 27th, 2009
posted by
Pieter Tesch
‘Attempts at equalising historical wrongs are often aimed at Holocaust obfuscation’
Lessons for Darfur from an unfortunately not-enough-known Nazi versus Stalinist crimes debate in Europe.
The ‘genocide’ activists who cried the expected howls following the Washington Post’s ‘Sudan’s ‘coordinated’ genocide in Darfur is over’ (18 June) report and the ABC news story (broadcast 17 June), ‘US envoy: [...]
Read the rest of ‘Genocide Industry’ has Hidden Agenda.
Posted in Genocide Debate, Making Sense of Darfur | No Comments » |
Thursday, June 25th, 2009
posted by
Eric Reeves
Just how credible are UNAMID monthly mortality figures? The unhappy truth is that UNAMID is weak, ineffectual, widely despised by Darfuris, and has a clear interest in minimizing mortality so as to make its failure less conspicuous. I regard 98 “violent deaths” as a deeply misleading figure to cite in assessing current mortality in Darfur. All the acts specified in the 1948 Genocide Convention continue to take place in Darfur and eastern Chad.
Read the rest of On UNAMID’s Assessment of Mortality in Darfur.
Posted in African Union, Genocide Debate, Making Sense of Darfur, Numbers | 13 Comments » |
Monday, March 23rd, 2009
posted by
Alex de Waal
John Maynard Keynes was once irritated by a half-witted critic: “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?”
In 2004 I wrote in the London Review of Books, “this is not the genocidal campaign of a government at the height of its ideological hubris, as occurred with the 1992 jihad against [...]
Read the rest of Genocide by Force of Habit?.
Posted in Genocide Debate, Making Sense of Darfur | 14 Comments » |
Monday, March 23rd, 2009
posted by
John Hagan and Wynona Rymond-Richmond
Alex de Waal, Joachim Savelsberg, Alex Hinton, Tony Oberschall, Dan Chirot, and Scott Straus form a remarkably distinguished group of genocide scholars. We have benefited from all of their comments about our book, Darfur and the Crime of Genocide.
Our title reflects a deliberate choice that may not seem obvious to many readers [...]
Read the rest of Genocide: Criminal Behavior and Law.
Posted in Books and Articles Relevant to Darfur, Genocide Debate, Making Sense of Darfur | No Comments » |
Thursday, March 19th, 2009
posted by
Scott Straus
Darfur and the Crime of Genocide is an ambitious and in places interesting book that makes some important contributions. The core contributions concern the detailed analysis of the results from the 2004 Atrocities Documentation Survey (ADS) that was commissioned by the U.S. State Department. The authors make a good overall point that the discipline of [...]
Read the rest of The Stakes of the Label ‘Genocide’.
Posted in Genocide Debate, Making Sense of Darfur | 1 Comment » |
Monday, March 16th, 2009
posted by
Alex Hinton
Darfur and the Crime of Genocide is a terrific book, one that deserves praise for doing at least three important things. First, the authors, John Hagan and Wenona Rymond-Richmond make a clear, rigorous, effective argument that the mass violence in Darfur constitutes genocide. This is significant given that previously this argument has too often been [...]
Read the rest of Local Understandings of the Violence.
Posted in Genocide Debate, Making Sense of Darfur | 1 Comment » |
Sunday, March 15th, 2009
posted by
Alex de Waal
I was surprised to learn that the Prosecutor of the ICC is seeking leave to appeal against the Pre-Trial Chamber’s decision to not to charge President Omar al Bashir with genocide. The Prosecutor’s complaint seems to resemble that of a student who has been given a fail grade, arguing that the examination board should have [...]
Read the rest of Appealing the Genocide Decision?.
Posted in Genocide Debate, ICC, Making Sense of Darfur | 15 Comments » |
Friday, March 13th, 2009
posted by
Alex de Waal
In his latest contribution to the debate “what should Obama do about Darfur?” in The New Republic, Alan Wolfe poses the question, why does it matter whether what is happening in Darfur is genocide or not? Wolfe frames the question in terms of its implications for U.S. policy to stop future genocides. If Darfur today [...]
Read the rest of On the Significance of Determining whether Darfur is Genocide.
Posted in Genocide Debate, Making Sense of Darfur | 2 Comments » |
Thursday, March 12th, 2009
posted by
Jens Meierhenrich
John Hagan and Wenona Rymond-Richmond’s Darfur and the Crime of Genocide constitutes an important, if not always entirely compelling, contribution to the study of genocide. The book inquires into (1) the dynamics of genocide in Darfur; and (2) the promise—and limits—of criminology for making sense of it. It is, in many respects, a path-breaking work. [...]
Read the rest of Atrocity Statistics.
Posted in Genocide Debate, Making Sense of Darfur | No Comments » |