<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quo Vadis, ICC?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ssrc.org/darfur/2008/07/04/quo-vadis-icc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/darfur/2008/07/04/quo-vadis-icc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:36:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Klamberg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/darfur/2008/07/04/quo-vadis-icc/comment-page-1/#comment-2215</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Klamberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ssrc.org/darfur/?p=562#comment-2215</guid>
		<description>I do not agree that it is a &quot;lottery&quot; and that Lubanga&#039;s release would be a result of &quot;arcane ... jurisprudential technicalities&quot;. The Prosecutor has signed an agreement with the UN which prevents the defence from getting hold of potentially exculpatory evidence. There are some indications that the Prosecutor and the UN are changing their position. 

The principle of a fair trial has to be upheld and if the Prosecutor&#039;s decision brings down the Lubanga trial, we should blame the Prosecutor and not the ICC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not agree that it is a &#8220;lottery&#8221; and that Lubanga&#8217;s release would be a result of &#8220;arcane &#8230; jurisprudential technicalities&#8221;. The Prosecutor has signed an agreement with the UN which prevents the defence from getting hold of potentially exculpatory evidence. There are some indications that the Prosecutor and the UN are changing their position. </p>
<p>The principle of a fair trial has to be upheld and if the Prosecutor&#8217;s decision brings down the Lubanga trial, we should blame the Prosecutor and not the ICC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alesio Clement</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ssrc.org/darfur/2008/07/04/quo-vadis-icc/comment-page-1/#comment-1913</link>
		<dc:creator>Alesio Clement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 15:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ssrc.org/darfur/?p=562#comment-1913</guid>
		<description>It is shocking that legal complexity-or is it technicality- allows Lubanga to go free while his victims, whose lives are irreparably ravaged, are left without any chance of retribution. I hope he should not plug any loopholes when taking the perpetrators of Darfur genocide especially President Bashir who is calling the ICC terrorist organization, to The Hague.

Alesio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is shocking that legal complexity-or is it technicality- allows Lubanga to go free while his victims, whose lives are irreparably ravaged, are left without any chance of retribution. I hope he should not plug any loopholes when taking the perpetrators of Darfur genocide especially President Bashir who is calling the ICC terrorist organization, to The Hague.</p>
<p>Alesio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
